
The monthly e-newsletter covering the impact of technology on the business of sport
View From the Editor: Technology at the heart of a ratings war - February 2004 |
|||
|
What's wrong with radio ratings?
But back to sports radio. MacKenzie has been vitriolic in the UK press over the last year or so on the subject of radio audience ratings. He is currently preparing to file a law-suit against Rajar, the body responsible for radio ratings in the UK, on the grounds that the paper and pen 'diary' ratings system the organisation currently employs is outmoded and is costing TalkSport millions of pounds in lost advertising revenue. TalkSport has introduced a rival ratings system through use of a wristwatch developed by German research company GfK. The wristwatch is 'always on' and records all the radio consumed by the listener though a small microphone that is attached to it, without the listener having to remember to write it down "though ticking little boxes every quarter of an hour," says MacKenzie. "Technology has proved that when people fill in these diaries, they fill them in wrongly. This technology can be used in anything from a pen to a mobile phone. It doesn't matter how it is implemented, just make it real-time and make it fair." TalkSport became suspicious of the Rajar ratings diary system following the transmission of the Pakistan v England Test cricket series in 2000 "and we didn't register so much as a blip on the Rajar despite owning the rights exclusively." Research commissioned by TWG subsequently showed that not only was TalkSport's audience three times the size claimed by Rajar (6m versus 2m), but that overall radio listening across all stations was higher, although listeners tuned into these stations for shorter periods of time. Says MacKenzie: "The other radio groups in the UK hate me because they are being paid money for an audience that doesn't exist. Or where it does exist, the audience isn't spending as much time listening to it. Advertisers are being swindled." "When Rajar go into court they are going to have to defend the diary and that's going to be the biggest laugh in history. We tested people wearing a watch and filling in a diary [simultaneously] and they got the diary completely wrong. Rajar issued a press release saying those tests were wrong and when they get to court they are going to have to defend that and they can't. So I am feeling very bullish about our chances and am completely up for it." TWG will seek two things from the legal action continues MacKenzie. "Firstly damages in the region of nearly £2m a month in lost advertising through Rajar not implementing this technology - £25m-£27m in total. Plus we are seeking for the judge to tell the radio industry to decease from using the diary system. This is big-time stuff. A whole industry has to face up to the fact that the technology is there today and the diary system is wrong and has always been wrong. The sound of axes are being sharpened for a war. And that's what we are going to have - a war in court." With Rajar recently extending its research contract for another two years, therefore precluding a new system being introduced before 2006, MacKenzie and his team will be no doubt be bookmarking www.knivesplus.com/LANSKY.HTML Pats, Panthers, pom-poms and pizza
Rachael Church - Editor If you have any comments or feedback on this article or any of the features in Sport and Technology, we would like to hear from you. Please e-mail your comments to editor@sportandtechnology.com This article was seen first by people who receive the monthly newsletter, join them. |
|||
Related features
- Infostrada Sports' Databox
- Case Study: Player One gets the power
- View from the Editor: 2004 - HDTV Odyssey?
- Infostrada Databox: January 2008
- Q&A: 888.com and sports sponsorship
- View From the Editor: Life after the singing sandwich
- View from the Editor: Happy tripping for the LED generation
- View From the Editor: Poker faced about new technology?
- View From the Editor: Your 2012 'Plaice' or mine?
- View from the Editor: Tungsten and the Online Olympics
More features from this issue
- Q & A: Australian National Basketball League
- Case Study: TWI Interactive stays one step ahead in the mobile game
- View From the Editor: Technology at the heart of a ratings war
- Case study: Premium TV enjoys some retail therapy
- Feature: Back to school for premium content
- ArkSports Databox: Technology sponsor exposure in Formula One
- More feature articles
- More news from previous months


This month's View From the Editor starts with an apology to all of you who have complained about the prevalence of material in this column in recent times relating to my favourite sport. A sport with origins that stretch nobly back to medieval times and archery. I am of course referring to the superbly entertaining sport of darts.
In the last issue of Sport and Technology I mused over the possible joy that could be personally induced by watching 11-times PDC World Darts Champion Phil 'The Power' Taylor indulge in his arrows artistry by virtue of high definition television. This prompted a veritable trickle of consternation including an e-mail from a reader in the Netherlands (subject matter: 'Do we really want this?') who felt passionate enough to declare: "Would we really want to see all of this in glorious HD? This Phil Taylor does not look like one of the furry critters usually associated with the editor's favourite sport. Darts also involves a lot of sweat and a lot of close-ups. When those are combined with HD resolution you have a problem."
That's nearly all folks for this month, but Sport and Technology couldn't sign off without thanking the NFL UK for being the perfect host at London's sports party of the year, the Super Bowl 2004 party at The Ministry of Sound. 